Install Palestra app on your device

Palestra 7-8-2020

There is no need for personal contact between a convict and a defense attorney at preparing a statement on resumption of proceedings – commentary to the decision of the Supreme Court of 10 May 2018 (III KZ 20/18)

On 10 May 2018 the Supreme Court issued a decision in case No. III KZ 20/18, in which it highlighted the autonomy of the public defender to state his position at reopening the case, regardless of the views, of the party, he is representing. In previously mentioned glossary, the decision of the Supreme Court has been thoroughly analysed and supplemented with deliberations on procedural guarantees, compulsory representation by a lawyer, sanction of ineffectiveness and the formal rules of the written pleadings.

See this article in polish

Information about cookies

W ramach Strony stosujemy pliki cookies. Korzystanie ze Strony bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza zgodę na ich zapis lub wykorzystanie. Możecie Państwo dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies w przeglądarce internetowej w każdym czasie. Więcej szczegółów w "Polityce Prywatności".