Wydanie 4/2021

Palestra
4/2021

Dzwon „Katyń” – jeden z trzech dzwonów na Polskich Cmentarzach Wojennych w Katyniu, Charkowie i Miednoje, umieszczonych poniżej poziomu ziemi w specjalnej niszy, mającej symbolizować uwięzienie pod ziemią. Cmentarze są miejscem spoczynku niemal 22 tysięcy jeńców wojennych, w tym 10 tysięcy polskich oficerów, zamordowanych w niewoli rosyjskiej strzałem w tył głowy po 3.04.1940 r. Zdecydowaną większość ofiar stanowili oficerowie rezerwy, lekarze, adwokaci, prawnicy, naukowcy, artyści. Ogromne, ponad 800 kg dzwony zawieszono obok muru z nazwiskami poległych na cmentarzach w Katyniu, Charkowie i Miednoje.

Na zewnętrznej ścianie dzwonów umieszczono tekst Bogurodzicy oraz nazwę miejsca, do którego trafiły. Wydobywający się z czeluści ziemi stłumiony, przejmujący dźwięk dzwonu po raz pierwszy usłyszano podczas ceremonii otwarcia cmentarzy i upamiętnienia ofiar. Cmentarz Katyński otwarto 28.07.2000 r. Akt erekcyjny w czerwcu 1995 r. wmurował Prezydent RP Lech Wałęsa wraz z poświęconym przez Ojca Świętego Jana Pawła II kamieniem węgielnym pod budowę cmentarza. Fotografia z archiwum Ordynariatu Polowego Wojska Polskiego.

See PDF Version

Right to appeal against the administrative decision of the National Council of the Judiciary refusing to appoint a person a Supreme Court judge – opinion of the Advocate General of the CJEU

Andrzej Świątkowski

The character of request to repeat an interview with a minor victim pursuant to Article 185a of the Code of Criminal Procedure

Tymon Markiewicz

The relationship between the structure of law enforcement authorities and the legitimacy of the use of opportunistic solutions in criminal proceedings. Comments against the background of the Collective Entities Liability Bill

Bartosz Łukowiak

Exercise of the parties’ right to have their contract modified or terminated under Article 3571 of the Polish Civil Code

Radosław Strugała

Contracting and exercise of limited property rights for the benefit of the State Treasury by Państwowe Gospodarstwo Wodne Wody Polskie (Polish Waters state company)

Tomasz Nosal

The term “historical monument” in the criminal provisions of the Act of 23 July 2003 on the Protection and Care of Historical Monuments. Interpretation problems and (non)compliance with the nullum crimen sine lege certa principle

Piotr Poniatowski

Review of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (January–March 2021)

Marek Antoni Nowicki

Is it possible to commit one act and be held liable for concurrent offences of abuse of trust and failure to document business activity properly? Commentary on judgment of the Court of Appeal in Poznan of 26 March 2019 (II AKa 20/19)

Łukasz Duśko

Judicial review of resolutions of the bailiffs’ self-government bodies. Commentary on Supreme Court judgment of 27 November 2019 (I NO 134/19)

Edward Soszyński
Cezary Waldziński

Information about cookies

W ramach Strony stosujemy pliki cookies. Korzystanie ze Strony bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza zgodę na ich zapis lub wykorzystanie. Możecie Państwo dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies w przeglądarce internetowej w każdym czasie. Więcej szczegółów w "Polityce Prywatności".

Palestra
4/2021

Table of contents

Right to appeal against the administrative decision of the National Council of the Judiciary refusing to appoint a person a Supreme Court judge – opinion of the Advocate General of the CJEU

The character of request to repeat an interview with a minor victim pursuant to Article 185a of the Code of Criminal Procedure

The relationship between the structure of law enforcement authorities and the legitimacy of the use of opportunistic solutions in criminal proceedings. Comments against the background of the Collective Entities Liability Bill

Exercise of the parties’ right to have their contract modified or terminated under Article 3571 of the Polish Civil Code

Contracting and exercise of limited property rights for the benefit of the State Treasury by Państwowe Gospodarstwo Wodne Wody Polskie (Polish Waters state company)

The term “historical monument” in the criminal provisions of the Act of 23 July 2003 on the Protection and Care of Historical Monuments. Interpretation problems and (non)compliance with the nullum crimen sine lege certa principle

Review of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (January–March 2021)

Is it possible to commit one act and be held liable for concurrent offences of abuse of trust and failure to document business activity properly? Commentary on judgment of the Court of Appeal in Poznan of 26 March 2019 (II AKa 20/19)

Judicial review of resolutions of the bailiffs’ self-government bodies. Commentary on Supreme Court judgment of 27 November 2019 (I NO 134/19)

The site does not support the outdated browser you are using.

Palestra 4/2021

Table of contents

Right to appeal against the administrative decision of the National Council of the Judiciary refusing to appoint a person a Supreme Court judge – opinion of the Advocate General of the CJEU

The character of request to repeat an interview with a minor victim pursuant to Article 185a of the Code of Criminal Procedure

The relationship between the structure of law enforcement authorities and the legitimacy of the use of opportunistic solutions in criminal proceedings. Comments against the background of the Collective Entities Liability Bill

Exercise of the parties’ right to have their contract modified or terminated under Article 3571 of the Polish Civil Code

Contracting and exercise of limited property rights for the benefit of the State Treasury by Państwowe Gospodarstwo Wodne Wody Polskie (Polish Waters state company)

The term “historical monument” in the criminal provisions of the Act of 23 July 2003 on the Protection and Care of Historical Monuments. Interpretation problems and (non)compliance with the nullum crimen sine lege certa principle

Review of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (January–March 2021)

Is it possible to commit one act and be held liable for concurrent offences of abuse of trust and failure to document business activity properly? Commentary on judgment of the Court of Appeal in Poznan of 26 March 2019 (II AKa 20/19)

Judicial review of resolutions of the bailiffs’ self-government bodies. Commentary on Supreme Court judgment of 27 November 2019 (I NO 134/19)

The site does not support the outdated browser you are using.

Palestra
4/2021